A federal judge ruled in favor of the consumer, finding that because the finance company had routinely accepted late and partial payments and failed to provide adequate notice of intent to repossess, defendants did not have the present right to repossess. Read full opinion here: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-mnd-0_10-cv-02046/pdf/USCOURTS-mnd-0_10-cv-02046-0.pdf
Trista Obtains Summary Judgment in Favor of Consumer in Wrongful Repo Case
Updated: Mar 28, 2018
23 views0 comments